AP's Free Speech Problem

Someone at the AP's throwing a hissy fit.

The Associated Press, one of the nation’s largest news organizations, said that it will, for the first time, attempt to define clear standards as to how much of its articles and broadcasts bloggers and Web sites can excerpt without infringing on The A.P.’s copyright.

Sounds reasonable, right?

Well, not so much.

Last week, The A.P. took an unusually strict position against quotation of its work, sending a letter to the Drudge Retort asking it to remove seven items that contained quotations from A.P. articles ranging from 39 to 79 words.

Basically, there was so much negative feedback, that the AP later issued a statement backtracking, saying it was "heavy-handed" and that it was going to "rethink its policies toward bloggers." Except, well, it hasn't. They're still demanding Drudge Retort - which, correct me if I'm wrong - is all user-submitted content (in other words, very hard to control) - takes down the 39-79 word content. What BS!

Look, no bloggers should be completely ripping content off newspapers and newswires. That's unacceptable. However, newspapers can't suddenly expect bloggers to not use block quotes in their writing - which is pretty much the AP's intent. There's plenty room for give and take, as both sources help each other: newspapers helps bloggers with content, while bloggers help newspapers build readership and reputation. Newspapers must stop viewing blogs as competition and should start looking at us like the bacteria-sucking fish that are any shark's best friend. We'll make sure they don't get sick, as long as they don't eat us.

So, what should the standards for using newspaper content in blogs be? It would be nice to have a Old School/New School Media Convention, inviting all kinds of bloggers, journalists and editors to come together to the table, so we could hammer some of these things away. But I'm not that naive as to think newspapers would embrace it this soon. So, en lieu of that, why should the standards for using newspaper quotes in blogs be any different than using them in academic papers? At UMASS Dartmouth, using the national political science standard (which is fairly similar to other models), students could quote up to three paragraphs in aggregate from a newspaper. That's an eminently fair compromise, allowing bloggers to liberally quote from articles and make sure they get it right, while it isn't quoting so much that it's just stealing the article. That's the standard I've used on this blog since nearly the beginning; it would behoove the AP to adopt something like it, lest they just want their policy to be ignored.

AP: Casinos are a Panacea

There's an AP article in the New Bedford Standard Times today that basically asserts casinos are all things good and key to, I don't know, saving the Universe or something. Or at least the Hub of the Universe, Massachusetts, and its aging infrastructure.

House Minority Leader Brad Jones, R-North Reading, said Patrick has unveiled several big ticket items, including free community college, extended school year and commuter rail service to New Bedford and Fall River, without funding sources.

"In order to facilitate some of these, he needs new revenues," said Jones, adding that he expects Patrick to support expanded gambling. "If he's going to come out and say no, then I have no basis as to why it's taking so long to say no."

In addition to Patrick's announcement, the Legislature's Transportation Finance Commission is expected to report next week on its recommendations for closing a $15 billion to $19 billion dollar transportation funding gap over the next 20 years.... Sen. Steven Baddour, D-Methuen, co-chairman of the Transportation Committee, earlier raised the possibility of linking possible casino revenue to the closing of the transportation funding gap.

Dream on. At best, the state will receive approximately $100 million a year in revenue on casino profits - but it could receive as little as nothing, if the Wampanoags push hard enough. Certainly, that kind of money is nothing to sneeze at, but represents less than 1% of the total cost of the Big Dig. Oh, that'll fix the Massachusetts infrastructure all right. It wouldn't even put a dent into a New Bedford rail project, which would cost billions. But, in AP World, casino revenue isn't questioned. It's the only thing about a casino that's guaranteed.

What else will casino revenue cure in Massachusetts? Cancer? I vote we use all this money to build our very own space program, using a tiny sliver of the net revenue to go to Mars. Because that's where anyone's brain is at if they think casino revenue will fuel anything important in this state.