No matter how skilled the habitual liar, if they do it long enough, they're eventually going to get to the point where they can't come up with a new lie to cover the old ones.
As BMG makes clear, Romney's now there. Welcome, Mittens.
Let's look at this tangled web.
He claimed to be retired from Bain from 1999-2002 to the SEC/IRS, but Bain claimed he wasn't to the SEC, critically paying him a salary as chief executive. So, was Romney lying to the IRS, or was Bain lying to its investors and the SEC?
Now, Romney claims that his status as CEO of Bain from 1999-2002 was just technical jargon and wasn't his real position. In fact, he says he was totally removed from Bain and had no intention of coming back, despite the fact that he was still attending board meetings for companies Bain owned.
That's his answer to voters and his defense against what he listed on his SEC/IRS claims, but that's not what he was saying to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, where he insisted his time in Utah was just a leave of absence and that he always intended to return to Bain -- as his basis for why he should remain eligible to be Governor of Massachusetts.
This latest claim of his undermines his previous claim, that he was never going to go back. It's all the more serious a lie because, without it, it's likely he wouldn't have ever been Governor of Massachusetts.
So, what are we supposed to believe? What Mitt told the SEC and IRS? What Bain told the SEC? What he said to explain away the divergence of what he said to the IRS and what Bain said to the SEC? Or what he told Massachusetts, in order to be eligible to run for Governor?
Each claim is slightly different than the next, and undermines the others more and more. All that's left is the facts: whatever he says, he was on salary to be the chief executive officer of Bain and, contrary to his insistence that he had nothing to do with the company, was regularly flying in to Massachusetts on Bain business, even while living in Utah.
The bottom line? Other people go to prison for the kind of lies Mitt Romney habitually makes.
5 comments:
AND.....!!!
The SEC filing by BAIN 2001 is virtually an affidavid stating textually that ROMNER is the sole PERSON IN CONTROL and the MANAGING DIRECTOR, not only CEO and President
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1054290/000092701601001009/0000927016-01-001009-0001.txt
Pls request my approval before you use this information
regards
OTON TISCH
otontisch@yahoo.com
AND.....!!!
The SEC filing by BAIN 2001 is virtually an affidavid stating textually that ROMNER is the sole PERSON IN CONTROL and the MANAGING DIRECTOR, not only CEO and President
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1054290/000092701601001009/0000927016-01-001009-0001.txt
Pls request my approval before you use this information
regards
OTON TISCH
otontisch@yahoo.com
AND.....!!!
The SEC filing by BAIN 2001 is virtually an affidavid stating textually that ROMNER is the sole PERSON IN CONTROL and the MANAGING DIRECTOR, not only CEO and President
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1054290/000092701601001009/0000927016-01-001009-0001.txt
Pls request my approval before you use this information
regards
OTON TISCH
otontisch@yahoo.cominaRC
AND.....!!!
The SEC filing by BAIN 2001 is virtually an affidavid stating textually that ROMNER is the sole PERSON IN CONTROL and the MANAGING DIRECTOR, not only CEO and President
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1054290/000092701601001009/0000927016-01-001009-0001.txt
Pls request my approval before you use this information
regards
OTON TISCH
otontisch@yahoo.com
1003AND.....!!!
The SEC filing by BAIN 2001 is virtually an affidavid stating textually that ROMNER is the sole PERSON IN CONTROL and the MANAGING DIRECTOR, not only CEO and President
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1054290/000092701601001009/0000927016-01-001009-0001.txt
Pls request my approval before you use this information
regards
OTON TISCH
otontisch@yahoo.com
Post a Comment