Showing posts with label dog tracks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dog tracks. Show all posts

Monday, January 04, 2010

Race Tracks: Liars to the End

I just had a SHNS Capitol Brief snippet forwarded to me from the afternoon of Wednesday the 23rd. One of the stories in the brief was about Speaker DeLeo, cheer leading slots at the race tracks again, statements which have long-since past Albert Einstein's definition of insanity. The other one was about how the greyhound race tracks had seen their last day of greyhound racing (amen!). Needless to say, when the track spokesperson was quoted, I nearly died laughing.
Raynham Park spokeswoman Amy Lambiaso said 25 of the track’s 600 full-time and part-time workers had been laid off to date. Once live racing ends, another 50 to 60 will be laid off and 40 to 50 workers whose jobs are tied to dog handling will be let go. Lambiaso said all of those workers have already been notified of their layoffs and that they will be the first contacted for jobs should slot machines be authorized.
Freaking liars to the end. As has been well documented on this site, Raynham Park employs a fraction of their boasts - boasts which seemed to change daily back during the ballot campaign. George Carney famously gave two very different numbers when interviewed by two different journalists in articles published within a day of each other back during the campaign, only three months after he laughibly claimed the two tracks employed literally 6,000-8,000 people. For the record, Raynham Park, in 2002, employed only between 100-249 people, according to the US Census. It is surely many fewer people now, given how badly the industry did between 2002 and today.

From the industry that literally prevented their workers from receiving state-paid retraining, so they could continue to cry foul about their workers, using them as PR devices, I guess this is right about what you'd expect. If only George Carney and his lackeys would let sleeping dogs lie, but the truth is he'll do almost anything to keep his track open in hopes of one day getting slots. It should surprise no one that dishonest, corrupt people would seek to open a dishonest and corrupt business.

Thursday, October 01, 2009

The Nerve of These People

First, let's read one of SHNS's recent tweets.
Despite law ending dog racing, Raynham-Taunton files for full racing schedule next year. statehousenews.com
Then read a quote from an earlier SHNS story today (can't link to it, sorry).
MOHEGAN EYES REDUCED LICENSING FEES, TWO-YEAR WINDOW UNTIL OPENING

By Jim O’Sullivan
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE

BOSTON, SEPT. 30, 2009……The state should charge casino licensing fees between $25 million and $50 million and level tax rates in the low 20-percent range on gambling revenues, according to a top executive at the Mohegan Sun casino firm, one of several business interests circling as the Legislature considers gambling legislation.
Seriously, what are these people thinking.

The dog tracks don't think the rules apply to them, while the big resort casinos think that we should all bow before them for the privilege of having their ugly-ass buildings create all sorts of new, local problems "grow" jobs.

Remember when Governor Patrick was promising hundreds of millions in gambling licensing fees? What a freaking joke. Why does our state continue to waste time on this gimmick that won't solve a single, solitary problem -- while creating a whole bunch of new ones?

PS: I appreciate the fact that the SHNS is finally disclosing its casino conflict of interest. From the story above:
Editor's Note: O'Neill & Associates advertises in the News Service's Weekly Roundup.
For those who don't know, O'Neill & Associates gets a lot of money from the casino lobby. Honestly, I don't think it's a coincidence that the SHNS covers the casino issue so closely and is frequently at the forefront of pushing the "inevitability" meme.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

SHNS Needs to get Facts Straight

From today's State House News Service:
STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, SEPT. 10, 2009……Less than four months before a voter-approved ban on dog racing is scheduled to wipe out 1,300 jobs at racetracks and affiliated businesses, lawmakers on Thursday pleaded with their colleagues to permit dog racing for two more years or allow tracks to continue wagering without a live product.
According to whom? There aren't anywhere near 1,300 jobs in the racetrack industry in Massachusetts. Not even close. I'd be shocked if there were 300 jobs in the industry at this point.

So who's propagating these lies and distortions?
Reps. David Flynn and James Fagan and Sens. Joan Menard, Thomas Kennedy and Marc Pacheco, all of whom represent the area around Raynham-Taunton Greyhound Park, said that 1,300 workers face unemployment come January, when the dog racing ban takes effect.
My question for the Reps and Senators, where the heck have you been while the dog track industry has been telling its workers not to accept state help and training to get new jobs? It would be awfully hard for the industry and its political supporters to be crying foul if sad stories of workers weren't at stake, right?

Bottom line: the people of this state voted, by a sizable margin, to get rid of the dog track industry. The people who supported that ballot initiative were beyond reasonable for the workers in the industry, by creating a 14 month gap before the bill would take effect, leaving plenty of time for people to find new work. Funding was also put aside for retraining, but that retraining was largely refused, because the industry thought it would hurt their efforts in thwarting the will of the voters. Maybe if Pacheco, Flynn and Friends were a little more worried about the workers and less about the industry's stakeholders, there would be no worries about the jobs anymore.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Attn Wonderland and Raynham Park

I'm just wondering if you've finally decided to allow your workers to receive state help in retraining -- or if you're going to continue to toy with their lives in your attempt to control the public debate by using their very plight to attempt to further your last-gasp attempts at profiteering?

Thanks,

Ryan

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Cahill's Idea: Worst Ever?

In a word: Yes. Three slot parlors across the state makes no sense on any level.
State Treasurer Timothy Cahill plans to propose today that the state sell the rights to as many as three slot parlors across Massachusetts, a push far less ambitious than Governor Deval Patrick's bill for three casino resorts last year but one that Cahill will argue is the quickest way to boost state coffers.
Cahill says his plan would bring the state $244 million, to which I respond, so would raising the income tax by a small fraction of a percent. The kicker is the fact that it won't bring in $244 million, because slot parlors are merely a redistribution of the local economy and state lottery funds -- the very state lottery which Cahill has run to the ground. Why have people spending money at their local pubs, restaurants, bars, clubs and bowling allies, when up to 75% of that could be going to slot parlors, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston? Cahill's really got the interests of the people at his heart.

Furthermore, even assuming Cahill's numbers are accurate (they're not), what's $244 million? Does that balance our budget? Not even close. It invites a world of problems and starts the government addiction, which would be fed more down the road - through more parlors, real casinos, expanded gambling and reduced taxes on the industry.

Cahill's ties to the slot industry are well known and deep. He's taken in way too much in gambling lobby dollars - and he's run the state lottery to the ground. Hell, his slot parlor plan is merely an attempt to bail out the multi millionaires at the race tracks - who won't even allow the state to provide free retraining and employment services, because that would hurt the 'poor track worker' meme. His parlor "plan" is overly generous to boot - other states around the country tax these sorts of things at double the rate he'd plan. In other words, Cahill knows who his friends are -- and they're not the average, every day citizens of Massachusetts.

If this at all sounds a bit harsh - I apologize. I'm just sick of having this guy be our State Treasurer and continue his obsession with stale, insider ideas that not only don't solve any of our problems, but would only serve to create new ones, that cost more money to even think about solving. Don't we have enough problems already? Can't we use reasonable and fair methods of generating revenue to deal with those problems?

Sunday, March 01, 2009

Track Workers Refusing Retraining?

Now, obviously this is all part of a PR campaign, but let's forget that sort of context when we read the following quote from this article (read it!).
Amid hopes that slot machines or a delay in the racing ban could save their jobs, some track workers and state officials say that few of them have begun to look for a new job or seek training.
The article is a woe-is-me piece on a track worker who will eventually lose his track job. Now, I'm pretty far to the left if you were to place me on an ideological line, but not even I think government can help people who don't want to be helped. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink - after all.

But let's get back to the real world - and context. My suspicion is that this was a carefully selected case amongst the track workers - their Joe the Plumber - and whoever sent out the press release wants to make it appear as though these people need slot jobs. But they don't. George Carney, owner of the Raynham Track and Supreme Councilor of Pushing Slots Into Massachusetts, just wants to make voters think that.

The fact of the matter is this state is providing funds for slot worker retraining, more than most people who lose jobs will get. Help is available from other sources, as well. If the tracks are telling them not to seek that help or accept it, because it'll risk slots, then shame on them. But we can't allow slots in this state because people who work at the race tracks are refusing to accept free or inexpensive retraining.

Basically, this sort of thinking
“There’s always a possibility that even if the live racing goes away, slots could come in, and I might have a job,” said Pizzutti, a racing official at the track, who has not begun a job hunt.
is asinine, stupid and unacceptable. If this weren't a PR hack - probably a friend or relative of one of the track's owners - and he held this view, who would find that acceptable? It's not much better than people who go to gamble thinking they could win a million dollars, thus spending thousands of their own to do so, thousands they don't really have to spend. This is not thinking we should reward.

The people at the tracks need to understand - resoundingly so - that they should accept retraining, because slots have long been a pipe dream in this state and will probably continue to be so. Yet, George Carney is refusing any state help at the tracks for his employees.

Here's the bottom line:

Ken Messina is the Massachusetts manager of Rapid Response, a federally-funded program in every state, which responds to companies and employees facing closings and layoffs.

Messina said his team offered three months ago to set up shop at the dog track, hoping to educate employees about unemployment, health insurance and resume assistance.

“We were ready to go, and when we started talking to the representatives of the dog track, it was evident they were trying to see if there were any alternative things to keep the track open,” Messina said.

Track owner George Carney could not be reached for comment.

George Carney is trying to hold this entire state hostage, refusing to allow necessary retraining efforts for his employees, based on a scheme and a gamble that he can use the self-selected plight of his workers to gain enough sympathy to legalize slots. But his employees don't have to suffer - the state is plenty willing to help. George Carney is just choosing to make his employees suffer, thinking it may help him make additional millions.

This is George Carney's fault; he should be held accountable for his actions - which means no slots and no state bail out of track racing. No one should have any sympathy for George Carney or his ilk. They're manipulators who don't give a crap about their employees or the people they put in the poor house - which is about to become one in the same, because he's refusing the state's help in retraining his employees. If the state makes any move to help track workers, it shouldn't be slots - it should be a law mandating all greyhound race tracks accept state help in retraining their workers. Period.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Third Rail Politicking

If it's not pensions, it's nonprofit sector salary. The thing with third-rail politics isn't that there's never a point to the argument - in fact, there often is. Surely, some state pensions need to be fixed and there are nonprofit CEOs and executives being overpaid, especially in this economy. The problem, of course, is that there's all too much focus on these issues which, in the grand scheme of things, are rather petty when compared to the size and scope of our problems today.

Moreover, often times the people making these third-rail arguments are hurting their own cause - such as AmberPaw today, over at BMG. Amber argues that MSPCA is overpaying its employees by a lot. The news will surely cost a lot of donations to MSPCA over the course of this year - perhaps millions. The result? Even more people will be laid off, more clinics could be shuttered and, most important of all, more dogs and cats will be homeless and without anyone to care for them or find them permanent families. This is what it means to shoot your own leg.

All for an organization that applies over 90% of its funds directly toward caring for the dogs and cats, not administrative costs. In nonprofits, 90% is the gold standard - heck, 80% is considered good. It doesn't get much better than 90%. So, for this cause that's so important and already underfunded, it's going to get hit even worse, all because supporters were supplying an irrational amount of anger at salaries which are in fact middling for the industry and could have been dealt with in a way that wouldn't have hurt the pets (such as a few big donors signing a letter asking the top-paid employees take a 10-20% pay cut in this economy, to spare a few jobs from being laid off).

Monday, December 15, 2008

The Globe: Making Stuff Up

Seriously, this is crap.
Those two tracks - Raynham-Taunton Greyhound Park and Wonderland Greyhound Park in Revere - employ about 1,000 workers and give millions of dollars in gambling revenue to the state.
According to the state's own figures, the entire racing industry in Massachusetts - horse and car included - employ 707 people. There's maybe 350-400 people working at Wonderland and Raynham tops, many of those part-timers.

That's only the most egregious example, not the most offensive. Let's quickly talk sub heading:
Support remains, but Patrick, top lawmakers back off.
Let me get this straight, Patrick's not supporting it, DiMasi's not supporting it and no major Beacon Hill leader right now is openly pushing for it... yet support remains? Where?

Shouldn't the story be "Patrick, top lawmakers back off casino support?" Isn't that the story, along with the fact that the entire casino industry's going belly under? Why the need to insist that "support remains?" It sounds like the Globe is trying too hard. If there was so much support to begin with, wouldn't we have casinos already?

Like I said, utter crap - or an agenda. Pick your poison.

Friday, November 07, 2008

Why Does Every Greyhound Story...

Come from the perspective of the tracks, track owners or track employees in the Boston Globe? Do they ever bother to talk to anyone but George Carney, Charles Sarkis or their Rolodexes? If ever there's a picture of a dog track related story, it's of happy dogs racing and having fun or the employees huddling in a corner crying. It's not of the dogs trapped in their cages, the violent collisions resulting in serious injuries to over 800 dogs since 2002, or even of dog-track protesters canvassing with their adopted greyhounds.

Why not write a story focusing on the happy grassroot volunteers who fought years on end to pass a racing ban? Isn't that the real story here? Too Paper of Record-y?

More questions...

Why does the Globe continually use its news space to editorialize the need for slot machines?
Resigned to the end of dog racing, track owners and the lawmakers who support them said they will launch a renewed effort to legalize slot machines in dog and horse tracks in the hope of restoring the estimated 1,000 jobs and millions of dollars in gambling revenue that will be lost when live racing ends.
And why can't Globe reporters be factual when it comes to dog track jobs? There aren't even 1,000 race track jobs in Massachusetts - including the horse and amateur car tracks - never mind 1,000 at Wonderland and Raynham. The best estimate is around 300-400 jobs, many of them part timers.

And, in case anyone thought slot machines were the answer, as the Globe seems to suggest, they aren't:
Billionaire Backer Of Right-Wing Causes Is Down On His Luck
By Zachary Roth - November 6, 2008, 3:42PM

The casino company Las Vegas Sands, which is owned by right-wing billionaire Sheldon Adelson, has said it may default on debt and face bankruptcy, reports Bloomberg. In trading today, stocks in the company plunged.
And things aren't doing so well at the Racino in Rhode Island, either.

My last question: Why can't the Globe deal in realities? An article focusing on the jobs at Raynham and Wonderland is a bit premature given the fact that Question 3 specifically gives the tracks two years to phase out races and allow employees to find new jobs. Question 3's passage should not result in a single layoff tomorrow, the next day or even five months from now. People should have plenty of time to find new jobs, especially given the fact that Governor Patrick is promising state help to retrain workers, allowing the tracks to end positions as people leave.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

RaceTracks: Just in Time!

Wonderland decided to finally pay its taxes.
REVERE - Owners of Wonderland Greyhound Park wired a lump sum payment yesterday of $752,301 to the City of Revere to cover two years' worth of back taxes and utility bills
No, they weren't worried about the Question 3. They were worried about their license.
The payment makes the track current on its debts to the city through Dec. 30, takes it out of foreclosure, and comes just in time for a reapplication hearing for its operating license this afternoon with the State Racing Commission.
Once upon a time, rumor has it, there were consequences for not paying property taxes: property seizure. Apparently, those rules only apply to people, not special interests. With enough lobbyists and allies in government, two years of tax evasion is no biggie. The Mayor of Revere didn't mind much, but then again he wasn't one of the dozens in Revere to be laid off over the past few years, dozens who wouldn't have lost their jobs if Wonderland paid its share in taxes.

Of course, people can hold Wonderland accountable on Tuesday, even if state officials won't. Vote Yes on 3.

Monday, October 27, 2008

A Race Track Shocker!

Surely, the race track industry would never misrepresent the facts.
An Ohio-based researcher is accusing greyhound racing supporters in Massachusetts of misrepresenting her human sports-injuries study to counter the argument that dog racing is dangerous to the animals.

Supporters of the state’s two dog tracks have used the federally-funded study to claim high school sports are more dangerous than greyhound racing.

But the study’s author says they inflated athletes’ injury rates in number and context.
Everyone should always trust those swell guys at Wonderland and Raynham. They're just angels taking care of all of those dogs... /sarcasm off

Vote Yes on 3.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Dogs and Broken Legs: No Big Deal

That's what the Massachusetts race track industry has to say.

Here's a video I put together and posted on YouTube, using quotes from a 10/11/08 debate on WBZ radio between Christine Dorchak, of the Committee to Protect Dogs, and John O'Donnell, of the Committee that thinks they should be tortured, abused and sent out to pasture.



Luckily, I think John O'Donnell's opinion will be in the minority on election day. Remember, come November 4th, vote Yes on 3.

Update: Polling continues to be good for Question 3. The main danger is the race industry's deceptive campaign, which could leave voters confused on election day. As long as everyone knows what they're voting on, the good guys win. But that's no easy task. Talk to your friends, neighbors and coworkers and make sure they know to vote Yes on 3.

----

Also, a quick notice: if you like original videos on Ryan's Take, please consider contributing a few dollars below, going toward a Flip YouTube camera for new interviews, forums and online workshops posted to Ryan's Take and LeftAhead. Even $5 or $10 would go a long way. Thanks!




Tuesday, September 30, 2008

8 More Seriously Injured Greyhounds

From the Committee to Protect Dogs:
Raynham, MA – According to records released yesterday by the Massachusetts State Racing Commission, eight greyhounds suffered broken legs at Massachusetts dog tracks in August. Three dogs suffered broken legs in one day on August 24, continuing a trend that saw nine dogs suffer broken legs in June and seven in July.

In total, 842 greyhounds have been injured while racing at local dog tracks since 2002. Nearly 80% of these injuries involved broken legs, and other reported injuries include paralysis, head trauma and death from cardiac arrest. A few weeks ago, the Committee to Protect Dogs announced that it has documented nearly 400 violent, and sometimes fatal, dog race collisions that took place at Massachusetts racetracks in 2007 and 2008. Video footage has been posted online at www.ProtectDogs.org.
I'm starting to see Yes 0n 3 signs begin to pop up all over Lynn and Swampscott, two communities just outside of Revere - where the Wonderland Race Track is located. It's about a month from the election. The race tracks will likely spend millions to confuse the voters, but anyone who thinks greyhound racing is cruel should feel good about where we're at. Momentum is definitely on our side.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

The Dog Track "100%" Adoption Claim

Yesterday, there was an ad in the paper version of the Globe on Question 3, from the the anti-dog group confusingly and absurdly named Massachessetts Animal Coalition (and yes, they spelled the name wrong!). In the ad, there was the biggest whopper of a claim yet.


In the eight years from 2000 to 2007 465,176 greyhounds raced at Massachusetts tracks.
Of course, that number is completely misleading. Saying that 464,176 different dogs raced at Greyhound and Wonderland Race Track - the two dog tracks in this state - would be like saying 100,000 different people have been to my site. Nope! My site may have had 100,000 hits, but most of my traffic comes from frequent readers - who click on my site over and over again. It's the same with the dogs: Greyhounds may have raced 465,176 times from 2000 to 2007, but the number of Greyhounds who did that racing is only a tiny fraction of that number. In any given year, there's 2-3k Greyhounds racing in Massachusetts. A typical Greyhound will only last racing for a few years, maybe 3 tops. Raynham and Wonderland aren't anywhere near big enough to handle 465 thousand dogs in 7 years. I'm not so sure that many dogs have raced across the entire country in that time.

But as my first link indicated, the track campaign - so far - has made it its goal to confuse the voters. I guess with so many newspapers coming around to the fact that the industry's made up its job numbers as it went along, they can't rely on convincing voters to vote for the tracks on jobs alone. Their only hope is to completely confuse the grassroots supporters who have rallied around phasing out greyhound racing in this state.

They also make this same claim in their newest internet ad:



I can only hope the media will do its job. Ballot question are confusing enough - campaigns should not be able to get away running on sleaze and disinformation. Just like their 100% adoption rate was made up, so too is their latest claim. When will all of this stop? It's past time that people who use these dirty tactics be held accountable - and, luckily, the voters can do that by voting Yes on 3.

________________________
Sponsor a post for $10 and help make this site better. Proceeds will be going here, to get a small camcorder for interviews and events (so I can post them online). By sponsoring a post, you get your name attached to my newest blog, as well as a sentence on the bottom in which I can put a link to your website, blog or store.






Monday, September 22, 2008

Of All the Dirty, Underhanded Tactics...

This from today's State House News Service (sorry, can't link to SHNS):

DOG RACING GROUP TAKE NAME OF GROUP SUPPORTING RACING BAN

A ballot question committee has formed to oppose Question 3, which bans dog racing, but the committee appears to have taken the name of an existing statewide non-profit dedicated to fostering collaboration of animal care professions and supportive of the ballot initiative. There’s another problem on Monday’s filing of the “Massachusetts Animal Coalition” – the group spelled its name the Massachessetts Animal Coalition. The group lists its chairman and treasurer as Jill Mead of Wellesley and Lynne Morin of Raynham as its “other officer.”

Of course, dirty, underhanded tactics is all they've got. The tracks can't win among the voters unless they confuse them.

Monday, August 04, 2008

"Long and Trusted Relationship." Ha!

From the State House News Report: Governor Patrick thankfully refused to support a bailout of the Wonderland Race Track - and their refusal to pay property taxes. Don't worry, though, Wonderland and Revere's Mayor have worked it all out...
In a statement, Wonderland executive Dick Dalton said, "We take full responsibility and have taken immediate action to arrange a payment plan to settle the arrears. We have spoken with Mayor [Joseph] Ambrosino and expressed our deep regrets for any inconvenience we have caused the City of Revere. The City of Revere has been a long and trusted partner and we value our continued relationship with the community.
There's a long and trusted relationship? What part of 'long and trusted' and 'relationship' is withholding more than $800,000 dollars? In long and trusted relationships, does one party take all the money and run? Or do they go years in which one party doesn't pay the legally required taxes to the other? How many layoffs did that $800,000 lead to in the city of Revere - how's that for long and trusted?

It's a relationship, all right, and certainly long - but trusted? Revere is the long and abused wife, who's just starting to work up the courage to leave. Certainly, this $800,000 fiasco will do wonders for the community - in convincing them that they don't need Wonderland Race Track and the hundred favors every year it'll need just to stay open. It's not good for the community one bit, not only are hundreds of dogs being injured there every year, but they can't even manage to pay their own taxes. It's time we put this dog industry out of its misery - and I thank the fine folks at Wonderland for making my case for me.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Sherlock Holmes and the Case...


Sherlock Holmes and the Case of
the Mysteriously Changing Race Track Job Figures!

By Ryan

It was the Wednesday when I last read my email - on July 16th, 2008 to be precise - where I first noticed something was amiss. I imagined that what I was reading was as if I had been reading it one hundred years before, electronically digitalized text transposed to paper and ink, the kind that would rub off your fingers if you read it too long. There were many stories, in many papers, that day, but none of them quite made sense. I knew this was a job for my friend, the great Sherlock Holmes.

So I left my home and wandered down the dirty streets of London. There were the shops, the barbers, the butchers, the bakery - all the sorts of things you'd expect to see walking through a densely packed London street. The people were walking to and fro as if nothing was wrong at all. And then I saw it - Holmes's flat, nearly like any other. Years ago there may have been a sign above his door, but he had no need for such advertisement these days. His powers of deduction, now famous, were quite beyond compare, of course. That's why I knew if anyone could figure out how many jobs were at Race Tracks in that little state across the pond, Sherlock Holmes could.

So I walked up his first few steps and knocked on his door, as I had hundreds of times before, to see his servant girl open the door quite kindly. She led me to the parlor, where Holmes was sitting smoking his pipe as usual, reading the daily papers.

"Why, Watson, my boy, how good to see you!" Holmes said.
"Indeed, Mr. Holmes, I quite agree."
"And I can tell you're worried about these stories of all different job figures."

Stunned, I looked Sherlock Holmes over yet again, no matter how well I knew him, he always could manage to surprise me.

"Howsoever did you know?"

"Why, Watson, it's elementary - my dear boy - elementary. I know that, this early in the morning, you would never come to see me on a Thursday, of course, unless you had some sort of burning question in your mind. Furthermore, like me, I know you're prone to read the papers in the morning. So when I began to read, after I got up from bed, I noticed very peculiar stories, each contradicting the other, each with quotes coming from the same person on the same day."

"But how did you know."

"Oh, quiet Watson, I was getting at that. Of course, most people would find these contradicting stories quite perplexing, so when I noticed you came here at this hour, I simply deduced the fact that you wanted to get to the bottom of these ever-changing figures."

"Indeed."

"Well, fear not, Watson, I've already figured it out."

I shouldn't have found myself surprised one bit, but of course I did. "How?"

"Well, to be honest, it's quite easy. Let's take a look at the stories."

Holmes picked up several papers from a pile, each a different newspaper and each with a story about a mysterious man named George Carney. He was a man both powerful and influential both behind the scenes and out in the open - wealthy and quite willing to use his wealth to help hatch his mastermind plots. Of course, he also had a charming, quaint nature about him, and was savvy, getting most reporters to apparently believe or at least not question whatever he said.

"Here's the first story, Watson. Here, in the Taunton Gazette, he reports that 800-1000 jobs would be lost at two different tracks, if the Greyhound ban were to be enacted by popular vote. That would be about 400-500 jobs per track, but one would think he'd know whether his track were employing 400 or 500 people - because 100 people would represent upwards of a million dollars in costs every year. So, my dear Watson, it's quite clear - in just reading this article alone - that Carney is lying."

Stunned, I watched Holmes place the Gazette back on the table, replacing it with two other papers, now in his hand.

"And in these papers, the Brockton Enterprise and Patriot Ledger, we hear a completely different story. His track alone, he claims now, employs a full 650 people. While that further illustrates his dishonesty when it comes to these numbers, let's ignore that for now. Knowing that the two tracks could employ as little as 800 people, according to him, that would mean the other track would employ only 150 people. Is it likely that one track would employ 650 and the other 150, when they do the same job and require similar amounts of Greyhounds? I think not, Watson, I think not. It's only more clear that he's being rather liberal with his truth."

"Furthermore," Holmes began, "some of the stories began to get at other numbers that Carney didn't present, the ones that are actual facts and figures, according to the Government - the reporters, apparently, never bothered to look at them, failing to properly do their jobs, simply questioning Carney, but never his motives. It's quite sad, really. So I did a little searching to find the source of these Government figures."

"And you had time to do that this morning?" I asked.

"Of course, my dear boy, of course. You see, there's this wonderful thing that guys like George Carney just don't know about; I believe people like him call it 'The Google.' You just type in a few practical words here and there, and you could find information on almost anything! To people like Carney, it must seem like a difficult magic that must take a lifetime to learn, so they just ignore it as if it didn't exist. But people like me - we use it to find facts, figures and important theories nearly instantaneously."

He went on, "Knowing that it is your behavior to come here to clear such peculiar circumstances up, I decided to search these Googles before you arrived, to find out the real answer to your question - because, quite frankly, I'm tired of searching halfway across the country for them! So, if you'll allow me to continue?"

I didn't say anything else, but couldn't help but notice Sherlock Holmes's genius. He was able to get at the truth with nothing but a few words and a computer! Wow!

"Perhaps the most perplexing article of the bunch," he said, as he pointed to one of the final papers on the table, "comes from the Boston Globe."

He put down the Ledger and Enterprise, picking up the Paper of Record.

"Here we find another article that contradicts Carney's numbers, the article saying that both tracks employ 650 people combined. That's rather closer to reality, though still hundreds too inflated. Now, what's odd is the way the paper describes those 650 jobs. Here, I'll read the quote.
Carney added that the ban, if approved, will result in a loss of jobs; the two tracks employ about 650 part-time and full-time workers.
Now, does that mean Carney is saying the tracks employ 650 people? Likely, that's the case, and the reporter simply forgot to add a qualifying statement at the end of his sentence, such as 'according to Carney,' because the Boston Globe repeats a different number - much closer to reality - just two more sentences in. Here, have a look, Watson."

Holmes handed the paper to me, pointing to this particular sentence:
Supporters of the ban said Carney's employment figures are greatly inflated. "That number is closer to 250, according to the census," Adams said recently.
"Wow, this is quite perplexing, Mr. Holmes. What do you make of it?

"Well, as I said, the paper doesn't make this completely clear, though the probability is that - so closely tied to Carney's statement - Carney had informed the paper that 650 total jobs were at stake. Otherwise, the Globe would have had to reveal some kind of source before making such a blanket statement. Given that all the real sources, provided by the Government, reveal that there's a total of 707 total employees at all Massachusetts Race Tracks, including horse tracks and amateur car speedways, that's quite unlikely. The other tracks take up far more than 57 jobs, especially since one of the horse tracks is the biggest of all Massachusetts Race Tracks."

"So what's the answer?" I asked, "How many people are really employed at these dog tracks?"

"It's a wonder that only one of these papers even bothered to source the best source, when the Gazette attributed 700 jobs at all race tracks, including horse and car, to the Massachusetts Department of Labor. However, none of the papers referenced the US Census numbers, which describes how many jobs are at each track - which would have saved a guy like me all this trouble! I'm retired, for heaven's sake!"

Sherlock Holmes was clearly annoyed, yet he somehow managed to continue.

"All they had to do was click here on their computers, they would have found the answer. Carney employs between 100 and 249 people at his Race Track according to the Census, which breaks businesses into various size classes. However, looking at the payroll of his company, which is public records through a court case he filed, we can tell that the actual number is close to around 200 as of a few years ago. Though, that's likely down a few employees, because his company has been bleeding profits. We know that the other Race Track in question, Wonderland, claimed the 250-499 bracket on the Census data from a few years ago."

"Well, if Wonderland employed 499 people, wouldn't that mean Carney's numbers were right?"

"Unlikely, my dear Watson, unlikely. Nay, impossible even. Knowing that both tracks require around the same number of dogs and that the Raynham track is and has been the more successful of the two for over a decade, Wonderland's track must have employed something very close to the 250 figure those years ago. However, we now know that Wonderland is taking in less than 2 million a year in wagers, meaning they couldn't afford to employ 250 people and stay in business. It's very likely that the number today is below 200, and likely far below it. And don't forget that we know, from the State Department of labor, that all the tracks employ a maximum of 707 people."

"So, as I said before, how many people do the tracks employ?"

"I'm getting there, Watson, I'm getting there. It's clear that Raynham employs around 200 jobs; it's quite likely that Wonderland employs around the same. That would be a total of about 400-450 jobs, leaving 250-300 between the horse and car tracks. Suffolk Downs, the state's largest track, would likely need around 250 employees to run the facility and serve the patrons, so I think we have our number, pinned within 50 employees."

"Indeed we do, Mr. Holmes, indeed we do."

"Thank goodness, Watson! Now, if you'd please, let me finish reading this morning's paper!"

Watson shook his friend's hand and left for the day, knowing that come another there would be more mysteries to solve - mysteries, he hoped, that would take more than Google to uncover.

Monday, June 23, 2008

The Casino Job Mythos

One of the biggest reasons some people claim to support casinos is for the jobs. It's one of the age-old arguments - that casinos create jobs time infinity, all of which provide decent benefits. Of course, it's another age-old phenomenon that the pro-casino lobby usually lies, distorts and cheats it's way to their much ballyhooed numbers. Anyone remember those 25,000 construction jobs? Yeah, right.

Well, as the casino debate in Massachusetts shifts to Racinos this summer, it's important for everyone, including Beacon Hill, to note that the Racino Lobby is as gifted with their math as the Casino Lobby - 25,000 construction jobs being only the most laughable example. Need a refresher? Let's take a look at what George Carney, owner of the Raynham tracks, has said in the past:

Falsehood #1

"I'm sticking with 650 [jobs]."

George Carney continuously claims to employ 650 people at the Raynham Racetrack. Of course, according to the Census, the actual number is less than 250 - including part timers. Specifically, between 100 and 249. Oops.

How gross is that lie? Well, if you combine all the race tracks in this state - dog, horse, car, whatever - there's 707 employees, according to the Massachusetts Department of Labor. So, George Carney claims to employ almost as many racing-related jobs as the entire industry of Massachusetts. George, we know you're big, but not that big!

What tangled webs we weave. Let's pretend George is right - he has 650 employees. George also released documents that give definitive labor costs for the Raynham Track. Here's George's labor costs over a 9 month period in '06:
Taunton Dog Track, Inc. – “casual labor” $8,800
Taunton Dog Track, Inc. – “salaries and wages” $544,500
Massasoit Greyhound Association – “contract labor expense” $1,980,092
Massasoit Greyhound Association – “salaries and wages” $2,622,384
Total: $5,155,776
So, if George's claims are right and he truly employs 650 people, there's some very simple math to do. 650/5,155,776 = $7,931. Either George is paying his 650 minimum wage or less (and he claims his jobs are good jobs), or he's completely full of himself. Even George knows his math is as fuzzy as a pair of over-used tennis balls.

Now, if George really employs ~200 people, that number is a more reasonable $25,779. Sound about right?

Falsehood #2

"If the ban on dog racing wins approval... it could eliminate 6,000 to 8,000 jobs at the two tracks."

Right off the bat, we've deduced that Carney employs between 100 and 249 employees at Raynham. Let's be generous and round up to 250. If that's the case, the other park in question, Wonderland Racetrack, would have to employ between 5,750 to 7,750 jobs. Of course, according to Census numbers, that's laughable. Note to George: they couldn't fit that many cars in the Wonderland Parking Lot.

In 2002, Wonderland employed between 250 and 499 full time and part time employees. Of course, there's probably even less now, given recent trends at Race Tracks in Massachusetts and across the country. In fact, Wonderland even threatened that if it doesn't get its way with Racinos, it'll shut up shop and close for good. Good riddance. With hundreds of millions being invested just across the street on the beach, as well as a T station even closer, there's limitless possibilities for those acres to be used, which could bring more and better jobs for the area - industries that aren't so prone to lie, distort and cheat about their numbers.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Saving the Dogs and Our Souls

According to The Committee to Protect Dogs, with over 45,000 signatures collected, it looks like Massachusetts voters will have the opportunity to save greyhounds from cruelty. The good thing about a measure such as this is it appeals to all people - that's why it was one of the closest ballot initiatives ever, last time it was on the ballot. Democrats and Republicans own dogs: no one who owns a dog wants to see them trapped in a cage so small that they can barely move, for more than 20 hours a day. What kind of life is that? It's no wonder that so many get hurt, killed and euthanized due to injuries that occur because of the cruelty with which they're treated.

The Globe attached a picture to their article about the ballot initiative, which I linked to above. It's of the dogs racing at a track, free from being trapped all day. It would be better to show pictures of all the dogs that are killed. I saw a documentary, years ago, of dog after dog being thrown into a giant trash receptacle, no doubt to be picked up before they started decaying. Or the Paper of Record could have shown a picture of the dogs with missing ears, limbs or scars so hideous that even people without a pet could grasp what's truly going on - and want to do something about it. We just don't want to see those pictures, because they make us sick. But that doesn't mean the Globe shouldn't show them.


Greyhounds in their kennel. They're kept in there almost all day long. I'll spare everyone from the far more gruesome pictures you can find using Google Image, searching for "greyhound cruelty."


Race Tracks aren't fun for dogs; they shouldn't be fun for people. People bet and dogs die. How entertaining. Imagine if the people who bet on dogs were the ones who had to take care of them. Suddenly, these people would realize it's less an industry as it is a legalized version of the movie Hostel, just this time for canines. Would people still get their kicks and thrills? I doubt it.

The good news is we can have our cake and eat it too. These Race Tracks are large lots of land. We need lose no jobs, because something more lucrative could be built with just a little ingenuity. Race tracks are already a dying enterprise, we're just making it happen a few years sooner, saving who knows how many dogs in the process. The good news is that whatever replaces the dog tracks will probably be better, both for profits and dogs. It's tough to think of a more horrendous way to make money than dog tracks, so lets decide as citizens of the Commonwealth to demand better.

About Ryan's Take